Green Bay Packers vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats reveal a playoff masterpiece that unfolded at Lincoln Financial Field, where the Philadelphia Eagles delivered a commanding 22-10 victory that sent shockwaves through the NFL postseason landscape. This wasn’t merely another Wild Card weekend upset – it was a comprehensive dismantling that showcased everything wrong with Green Bay’s approach against elite competition and everything right about Philadelphia’s championship blueprint.
From Oren Burks’ game-changing fumble recovery on the opening kickoff to Jordan Love’s triple-interception nightmare, every statistical category told the story of two franchises moving in opposite directions. The Eagles’ defensive dominance, anchored by 119 rushing yards from Saquon Barkley and flawless game management from Jalen Hurts, exposed the fundamental flaws that had plagued Green Bay throughout their 0-6 record against NFC playoff contenders during the regular season.
As Philadelphia advances to the divisional round with their third playoff victory over Green Bay in franchise history, these player statistics provide the definitive roadmap of how defensive pressure, turnover creation, and situational football excellence separate championship contenders from playoff pretenders in the unforgiving theater of January football.
Setting the Playoff Stage: Eagles Dominate From Opening Kickoff
Walking into this matchup, few expected such a lopsided affair between two teams that combined for 25 regular season wins. The Eagles entered as 14-3 juggernauts, riding a wave of 12 victories in their final 13 games, while Green Bay’s 11-6 record masked deeper concerns about their performance against elite competition.
Game Overview Statistics
| Team | Final Score | Total Yards | Turnovers | Time of Possession |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philadelphia Eagles | 22 | 331 | 1 | 32:45 |
| Green Bay Packers | 10 | 298 | 4 | 27:15 |
Philadelphia’s statistical dominance began before the first offensive snap. Oren Burks forced a fumble on the opening kickoff return, setting the tone for what would become a turnover-heavy afternoon that favored the home team. This early momentum swing provided the Eagles with excellent field position and an immediate psychological advantage that they never relinquished.
Pre-Game Context: Tale of Two Different Trajectories
Regular Season Performance Indicators
The contrast between these teams became evident when examining their regular season trajectories:
- Philadelphia’s Elite Competition Record: 8-2 against playoff teams
- Green Bay’s Struggle vs. Contenders: 0-6 against NFC playoff teams
- Eagles’ December Surge: 4-0 in final month with 128.5 points per game
- Packers’ Late-Season Concerns: 2-2 in December with defensive lapses
Key Player Availability Impact
Injury reports revealed crucial differences in roster health:
- Jalen Hurts returned to full health after concussion protocol
- A.J. Brown’s availability provided deep threat capability
- Green Bay’s receiving corps dealt with multiple injury concerns
- Packers’ secondary missing key contributors from earlier season
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown: Statistical Dominance
| Quarter | Eagles Points | Packers Points | Key Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 10 | 0 | Eagles: 2 turnovers forced, 127 total yards |
| 2nd | 0 | 0 | Defensive struggle, field position battle |
| 3rd | 6 | 3 | Eagles: 2 field goals, sustained drives |
| 4th | 6 | 7 | Packers: Garbage time touchdown |
The opening fifteen minutes established statistical trends that would define the entire contest. Philadelphia scored 10 unanswered points while forcing multiple turnovers that shifted field position decisively in their favor.
Quarterback Performance: Tale of Two Signal Callers
Jalen Hurts vs Jordan Love Statistical Comparison
| Statistic | Jalen Hurts | Jordan Love |
|---|---|---|
| Completions/Attempts | 13/21 (61.9%) | 20/33 (60.6%) |
| Passing Yards | 131 | 212 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 3 |
| Rushing Yards | 36 | 15 |
| QB Rating | 109.8 | 34.2 |
Hurts’ Efficiency Breakdown
Hurts’ performance demonstrated textbook playoff quarterback management:
- Red Zone Excellence: 2/2 touchdown passes inside 20-yard line
- Pressure Response: 8/11 completions when blitzed (72.7%)
- Third Down Conversions: 4/7 attempts converted (57.1%)
- Deep Ball Accuracy: 3/5 on passes 15+ yards downfield
Love’s Struggle Under Pressure
The Packers quarterback faced relentless defensive pressure that affected his decision-making:
- Interception Breakdown: 1st quarter (forced fumble recovery), 2nd quarter (coverage sack), 4th quarter (desperation heave)
- Pressure Statistics: Hurried on 42% of dropbacks (14 of 33)
- Accuracy Issues: 3/11 on intermediate routes (10-20 yard range)
- Fourth Quarter Desperation: 5/8 for 67 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT when trailing by 15+
Running Game Analysis: Contrasting Approaches
Philadelphia’s Ground Dominance
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | Long | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | 25 | 119 | 4.8 | 18 | 0 |
| Jalen Hurts | 6 | 36 | 6.0 | 14 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 155 | 5.0 | 18 | 0 |
Green Bay’s Limited Ground Game
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | Long | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 18 | 81 | 4.5 | 13 | 1 |
| Jordan Love | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 8 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 96 | 4.6 | 13 | 1 |
Barkley’s Impact Beyond Statistics
Saquon Barkley’s performance transcended traditional rushing metrics through several key contributions:
- Drive Sustainability: 8 first downs generated through rushing
- Physical Wear Factor: Forced 18 missed tackles according to Next Gen Stats
- Clock Control: Average drive time of 6:42 when Barkley carried 3+ times
- Third Down Conversions: 3/5 success rate on third-and-short situations
Defensive Excellence: Philadelphia’s Championship Foundation
Turnover Creation and Field Position
The Eagles’ defense created short fields through opportunistic playmaking:
| Turnover Type | Quarter | Field Position | Points Generated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Fumble | 1st | GB 28 | 7 points (TD) |
| Interception #1 | 1st | GB 45 | 3 points (FG) |
| Interception #2 | 2nd | GB 38 | 0 points (end of half) |
| Interception #3 | 4th | PHI 22 | Game security |
Individual Defensive Standouts
| Player | Position | Tackles | Sacks | INT | Key Stat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Blankenship | S | 11 (7 solo) | 0 | 1 | Led team in tackles |
| Nolan Smith Jr. | LB | 5 | 2.0 | 0 | Team sack leader |
| Darius Slay | CB | 4 | 0 | 1 | Pass breakups: 3 |
| Josh Sweat | DE | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | QB pressures: 6 |
Receiving Production: Limited Opportunities and Missed Connections
Eagles’ Balanced Receiving Attack
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | Long | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeVonta Smith | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 19 | 0 |
| Dallas Goedert | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 16 | 1 |
| A.J. Brown | 2 | 28 | 14.0 | 18 | 0 |
| Jahan Dotson | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 11 | 1 |
Green Bay’s Receiving Struggles
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | Long | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 15 | 0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 12 | 0 |
| Tucker Kraft | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 11 | 0 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 14 | 0 |
Advanced Statistical Analysis: Situational Football Excellence
Third Down and Red Zone Efficiency
| Situation | Eagles Success | Packers Success |
|---|---|---|
| Third Down Conversions | 6/12 (50.0%) | 3/11 (27.3%) |
| Red Zone Scoring | 2/3 (66.7%) | 1/2 (50.0%) |
| Red Zone TDs | 2/3 (66.7%) | 1/2 (50.0%) |
| Goal-to-Go Success | 2/2 (100%) | 1/1 (100%) |
Time of Possession Impact
Philadelphia’s ability to control game tempo proved decisive:
- First Half Control: Eagles held ball for 17:23 vs Packers’ 12:37
- Sustained Drives: 6 drives of 5+ minutes for Philadelphia
- Three-and-Outs: Packers forced to punt 5 times vs Eagles’ 3
- Average Drive Length: Eagles 5:47 vs Packers 3:12
Coaching Decisions and Tactical Adjustments
Philadelphia’s Strategic Advantages
Key coaching decisions that influenced the outcome:
- Defensive Game Plan: Vic Fangio’s coverage schemes limited big plays
- Offensive Balance: 31 rushing attempts vs 21 passing attempts maintained control
- Clock Management: No delay of game penalties despite challenging conditions
- Personnel Usage: Rotated defensive line to maintain pressure throughout
Green Bay’s Missed Opportunities
Critical decisions that hindered the Packers’ comeback chances:
- Fourth Down Aggression: 1/3 conversion rate in crucial situations
- Red Zone Play-Calling: Settled for field goal on opening drive
- Defensive Adjustments: Failed to contain Barkley’s outside zone runs
- Time Management: Used timeouts inefficiently in second half
Historical Context and Future Implications
Playoff Series History
| Matchup History | Eagles Wins | Packers Wins | Point Differential |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-Time Playoffs | 3 | 1 | Eagles +24 |
| Since 2000 | 2 | 1 | Eagles +11 |
| At Philadelphia | 2 | 0 | Eagles +18 |
| Wild Card Round | 1 | 0 | Eagles +12 |
This comprehensive statistical breakdown demonstrates how individual performances, coaching decisions, and organizational preparation combined to determine the playoff outcome. Philadelphia’s superior execution across multiple phases created decisive advantages that Green Bay couldn’t overcome, establishing the Eagles as legitimate championship contenders while ending the Packers’ season in disappointing fashion.
The numbers reveal two franchises moving in different directions – one demonstrating championship readiness through complete team performance, while the other exposed fundamental limitations requiring significant offseason attention before future playoff success becomes achievable.
